Appeal of Visual | Above and beyond the call of duty. | Is typed or with appropriate use of artwork/lettering, no erasures are visible, is clean, neat and orderly. | Is typed or contains the appropriate use of artwork/lettering, some factors of project lack required neatness. | Some sections are handwritten, lacks required neatness. | Handwritten with several pencil marks present, not near or orderly. | Obvious (to ALL) appears to be put together at the last minute with lack of care. |
3-D Component | Creative choice. Relevant to project. Shows a great deal of time and effort. | Neatly made, durable, relevant to project. Some creativity. | Average choice. Neatly made. Relevant. Durable. | Average choice. Poorly made. Relevance may be questioned. | Poor choice. Poorly made. Relevance questioned. | No 3-D component. Or so poorly made or lack all relevance. |
Organization of Visual | There is strong evidence of time and effort put into project, contains several graphics, is colorful, has a thoughtful and logical layout. | Suggests that time and effort was put into project, contains more than one graphic, some information is difficult to locate or is not in a logical sequence. Colorful. | Has one graphic related to topic, lacks visual appeal, difficult to locate or identify topic or information. Little to no color used. | Little or no evidence of time and effort put into project, contains no graphics, information is not clearly identified. Little to no color used. | | |
